Studi Komparatif Perhitungan Anggaran Biaya dengan Building Information Modelling (BIM) 5D pada Pembangunan Gedung Sistem Administrasi Manunggal Satu Atap Kepolisian Daerah Kalimantan Timur

Putri Arlisdyawati Agustina Amini, Reno Pratiwi, Fachruddin Harami

Abstract


In the construction industry, the accuracy of volume calculations and cost estimation is a crucial factor in ensuring project efficiency and quality. However, many projects in Indonesia still use conventional methods such as AutoCAD and Microsoft Excel, which are not integrated and prone to input errors and cost overruns. Along with technological advancements, Building Information Modelling (BIM) has emerged as an innovative solution capable of integrating all project data into a single digital model that can be updated in real time. This study aims to compare cost estimation results between the conventional method and the 5D BIM method using Autodesk Revit software on reinforced concrete structural works for the construction of the One-Stop Administration System (SAMSAT) Building of the East Kalimantan Regional Police, as well as to analyze the level of efficiency achieved. The research employs a comparative-quantitative approach using data obtained from the Detail Engineering Design (DED), Bill of Quantities (BoQ), and Unit Price Analysis (AHSP). The results show that the conventional method produces higher costs due to generalized volume calculations and excessive tolerances, while the 5D BIM method provides more accurate, efficient, and integrated results since each structural element is calculated automatically through digital modeling. Therefore, the implementation of 5D BIM has proven to enhance accuracy, time efficiency, and overall effectiveness in construction cost planning compared to conventional methods.

Keywords


Cost Estimation, BIM 5D, Autodesk Revit, Conventional Method, Construction Budgeting.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhar, L., & Nanda, M. P. (2023). Perubahan Desain Bangunan Gedung 4 Lantai Dengan Menggunakan Konstruksi Beton. 9(2).

Aryadi, S. M. P., & Herzanita, A. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Volume Pekerjaan Konstruksi Menggunakan Metode BIM Dan Konvensional. Construction and Material Journal, 6(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v6i1.4625

Dhou, Y. N., & Susanto, A. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Perhitungan Metode Konvensional Dan Building Information Modelling (BIM) Terhadap Volume Serta Biaya Pekerjaan Konstruksi.

Firmansyah, A., Riyanto, E., & Nusantoro, A. (2024). Penerapan Building Information Modelling (BIM) Pada Struktur Bawah Jalan Tol Yogyakarta – Bawen STA. 69+624,68 – 70+189,10. 8.

Fitriono, F., Haza, Z. F., & Shulhan, M. A. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Rencana Anggaran Biaya (RAB) Metode Konvensional Dengan Metode Building Information Modelling (BIM) (Studi Kasus Gedung 3 Lantai Di Yogyakarta). Surya Beton : Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 7(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.37729/suryabeton.v7i1.3031

Ihsan, S. A., & Wacano, S. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Perhitungan Quantity Take Off Menggunakan BIM Revit Dengan Metode Konvensional Pada Struktur Atas Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Rspon.

Jaya, L. R. P., Hendriyani, I., & Pratiwi, R. (2025). Implementasi Building Information Modelling (BIM) 5D Pada Proyek Konstruksi (Studi Kasus Pada Proyek Pembangunan Resto Manggar). Jurnal Komposit, 9(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v9i1.17282

Juliani, M. P., & Renaningsih. (2023). Analisa Perbandingan Volume Beton Metode Konvensional Pada Hasil Bill Of Quantity (BOQ) Dan BIM Autodesk Revit 2020 Terhadap Efektifitas Biaya.

Liando, F. J., Dapas, S. O., & Wallah, S. E. (2020). Perencanaan Struktur Beton Bertulang Gedung Kuliah 5 Lantai.

Mahardika, L. A., & Amar, T. I. K. (2025). Analisis Perbandingan Penjadwalan Dan Rencana Anggaran.

Mulyono, B., Zain, H. A., & Sudibyo, G. H. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Efektifitas Metode Konvensional Dan BIM Pada Elemen Struktur Beton (Studi Kasus Gedung Pelayanan Pendidikan Fisip Unsoed). Jurnal DISPROTEK, 13(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.34001/jdpt.v13i1.3078

Nurjaman, A. P. (2019). Perencanaan Struktur Beton Bertulang Bangunan Gedung Ekon 3 Lantai Di Kota Waisai. Jurnal Teknik Sipil : Rancang Bangun, 2(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.33506/rb.v2i2.480

Paryoko, V. G. P. J. (2022). Struktur dan Konstruksi sebagai Gagasan Eksplorasi Bentuk Bangunan dalam Studio Perancangan Arsitektur. Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur, 19(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v19i1.15962

Putra, Y. D., Hendriyani, I., & Pratiwi, R. (2024). Analisis Building Information Modelling (BIM) 5D Pada Pekerjaan Struktur Graha Sucofindo Balikpapan. Jurnal Konstruksi, 22(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.33364/konstruksi/v.22-2.2088

Rumbyarso, Y. P. A. (2021). Perencanaan Struktur Bangunan Atas (Upper Structure) Gedung Stie Bank BPD Jateng Kota Semarang. 24(1).

Saputro, Y. A. (2021). Detail Enginering Design Gedung Nahdlatul Ulama Ranting Bringin Bateait Jepara. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Multidisiplin, 4(2), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.36341/jpm.v4i2.1680

Suasira, I. W., Tapayasa, I. M., Santiana, I. M. A., & Wibawa, I. G. S. (2021). Analisis Komparasi Metode Building Information Modelling (BIM) Dan Metode Konvensional Pada Perhitungan RAB Struktur Proyek (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Pasar Desa Adat Pecatu). Jurnal Teknik Gradien, 13(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.47329/teknikgradien.v13i1.737

Yudiyanto, R. R. P., Winanda, L. A. R., Sunarwadi, H. S. W., & Kartika, D. (2025). Pemodelan 3D pada bangunan gedung guna mendukung implementasi BIM 5D pada proyek konstruksi. Jurnal Talenta Sipil, 8(2), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.33087/talentatsipil.v8i2.877




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/talentasipil.v9i1.1143

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Talenta Sipil, Faculty of Engineering, Batanghari University
Adress: Fakultas Teknik, Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email: talentasipil.unbari@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.